Hello readers,
Welcome to the AI For All newsletter! Today, we’re talking about Europe’s attempt to build the ultimate multi-lingual AI model, the future of conversational interfaces, and more!
AI in Action: AI is giving Europe a Tower of Babel

For decades, the EU's 24 official languages have been both its defining feature and its structural liability in AI. Frontier models get built where the training data is richest, which means English first, everything else later. European hospitals, courts, and public institutions have had to either accept that limitation or route sensitive data through American and Chinese cloud infrastructure to work around it. Last week, Brussels decided it had waited long enough. The European Commission selected the EUROPA consortium, led by Italian company Domyn, as the winner of its Frontier AI Grand Challenge — a competition launched in February to find someone capable of building a frontier-scale AI model fluent in all 24 EU languages at once.
The scale of the ambition is not subtle. The Commission is asking for a model exceeding 400 billion parameters, the weight class of the most capable systems currently deployed anywhere, built on a Mixture-of-Experts architecture and trained entirely on European soil. To make it possible, EUROPA gets access to up to 2.5% of EuroHPC's total supercomputing capacity for a full year — described as the largest single compute allocation ever offered to a European AI project. The result is supposed to be open-source, AI Act-compliant from day one, and available to universities, public agencies, and businesses across the continent without any of the data-residency headaches that come with closed American APIs.
Whether it works is a different question. A one-year compute window and a consortium win are a long way from a production model that researchers and hospitals actually rely on. Europe has a habit of funding ambitious AI initiatives and then watching the companies it was trying to beat ship three more generations in the meantime. But the strategic logic here is real: if you can turn linguistic fragmentation into a training requirement that only a European project would bother to meet, you've built a moat that OpenAI has no particular incentive to cross. The tower may or may not reach the heavens. The bricks, at least, are being laid.
🔥 Rapid Fire
Commentary: AI has turned Silicon Valley into a cargo cult
Analysis: The Silicon Valley Bubble (Part 2)
Companies rein in AI usage as costs strain budgets
The Tokenpocalypse is here — companies cut back on AI spending
“Leaked audio from Accenture says a big source of AI token chewing is people just converting PDFs to presentation slides”
You will not believe SoftBank’s presentation slides to shareholders
“It was the goose that created value”
Is Son okay? SoftBank CEO says AI bubble talk is blasphemous
Related: In 2020, Masayoshi Son defended SoftBank’s $13 billion loss by comparing himself to Jesus
Ford rehires quality inspectors after AI falls short
Senators revive push for labels on AI-generated content
Developers flock to Chinese AI model that is both competitive and cheaper
IBM debuts sub-1 nanometer chip technology
Your competitor just replied. You're still typing.
A lead comes in on Instagram. Another on Messenger. Three more on SMS.
Your team switches tabs, repeats answers, and loses context while hot leads wait hours for replies. At 2am, nobody responds at all.
That’s not a people problem. It’s a process problem.
Wati brings Instagram DM, Facebook Messenger, TikTok, WhatsApp, SMS, RCS, and web chat into one AI-powered inbox. Automations instantly respond, qualify leads, and route conversations to the right person, 24/7.
Your team stops firefighting. Your leads stop waiting. Your pipeline starts moving.
📖 What We’re Reading

Something is shifting in the IoT device landscape, and most manufacturers are not paying close enough attention to it yet. A new category of connected hardware is forming: devices designed not to automate tasks or collect data, but to provide ongoing presence, emotional engagement, and conversational companionship. These are not smart speakers with better marketing. They are a fundamentally different class of IoT devices with distinct connectivity requirements, user expectations, and a different definition of what “working” actually means.



